Most of you are familiar with the traditional face-to-face method of training and learning given in a classroom or seminar.

It is the oldest method for delivering training, and it can still get the job done effectively.


In classical training delivery, learners and the instructor are present at the same time.

Face-to-face experience provides the trainer and participant with immediate feedback. It enables participants to discuss and share ideas with others in the classroom or seminar.

The trainer presents materials, manages and guides discussion; responsibly ensuring that learning is constructive and positive. Traditional classroom delivery is thus termed teacher centric: an approach to training that gives the teacher control over learning.





The point of departure for the classroom delivery vehicle is the refinement and streamlining of content into effective, focused lectures. Although this method is appropriate for certain subjects, there are limitations.


The cost of holding classroom sessions can be high if people have to travel great distances to attend. Travel, hotel and living costs often constitute over 50 percent of a training budget.


Traditional Classroom Drawbacks


A commonly cited disadvantage of classroom training is determining an appropriate pace of training and learning. Learner groups are often heterogeneous, made up of both experienced and inexperienced staff, among whom there are fast and slow learners.


Lectures are typically oriented to the slowest learner, ensuring the inclusion of every participant, but resulting in a lack of challenge for many attending. Interaction is rarely mandatory, so classroom participants sometimes sit passively, failing to maximize their classroom involvement. Valuable staff time and motivation can be lost this way.


As companies globalize, and the need to share information increases, traditional classroom training delivery is rendered less viable and cost effective.